It disturbs me greatly that I have not read a book since November last year. I am still struggling with The Tin Drum. I remember being rapturous while reading the first 200-odd pages. Like with people, instant chemistry with books is seldom sustainable. I now trudge through the book, hoping to get to the finish line soon. A hundred pages have never seemed so formidable.
–
In recent times, I have contemplated suing my parents for a botched-up upbringing. They never bothered to inculcate a love for sports or singing or dancing in me- it seems that my legacy was limited to a love of books and food alone. I started reading at the age of five. My parents, reassured and relieved that the unusually curly-haired kid was indeed theirs (and not swapped at birth), showered me with books to mark their joy. Twenty volumes of abridged classics, which ensured that I had something to read for the next two years.
Writing happened thereafter. Somewhere between ‘A visit to the garden’ and ‘My favourite festival’, I discovered the joy of writing. Writing discovered me much later. It was 1997 or 1998. I decided to start working on my first novel, which I soon realized had absolutely no hope of seeing the light of the day. This frustration was compounded by the rumour that a young Indian writer had been offered a million-dollar advance for her debut novel (Yes, I was a precocious ambitious delusional teenager). Soon, this nasty nebulous rumour acquired a name: Arundhati Roy. The book? The God of Small Things. Consumed by jealousy and curiosity, I made my father buy me the rather pricey hardback version. One chapter and I was mesmerized. I didn’t even know you could make words do such tricks. Words could sing, dance, swim, hop, make love, everything that I could not, at my beck and call.
For the next two weeks, my state of mind vacillated between fascination, shock and denial, finally settling for acceptance: I had to swallow my pride and accept that Eklavya had found his teacher Dronacharya. Owing partly to my poor sculpting skills and partly to the limited portability of clay statues of curly-haired women, I took Roy’s picture on the cover of GOST as my teacher. What exactly did taking a picture as your guru entail? Not much, just seeking the picture’s blessings before every writing event was respectful enough. Call it superstition, faith or talent (but certainly not modesty), I won every writing competition I took part in under Ms. Roy’s tutelage.
This went on for five years, till her essay The End of Imagination happened. I had read the essay already, just after it came out, but that was but a cursory read -I was just overjoyed that she had written again, I didn’t care what. The second time, however, it struck me like a slap across the face: my guruji, my inspiration, my Guiding Star was one of them: she was a leftist intellectual.
That was the time when I had nothing but contempt for this breed called leftist intellectuals. They deftly juggled big words and small ideas. I was (and still am) irked by their constant need to espouse the fight of the marginal by belittling and battling the mainstream, their failure to comprehend that different is not opposite, their refusal to see shades anywhere except on khadi.
My philosophy was simple: Left is seldom right.
With time, I have realized that the same problems plague any extreme position. The difference is perhaps in the articulation of this opinion: leftists seem to prefer words and rightists in India sometimes let their sticks and stones do the talking. This maturity aside, a slight feeling of disdain still remains.
Anyway, how did I get here? The point is, as my copy of GOST lay on the shelf, dissed and dusty, I almost stopped writing. It’s been two years since I wrote, and this struck me last night.
Maybe, letting go is not always a good thing. When is one really too old for a security blanket? Or a lucky charm? Or a make-believe teacher? Well, not at 23. Guruji has been summoned from India. Yes, DHL delivers inspiration too.






14 responses so far ↓
Addy // March 13, 2008 at 12:02 am |
I must confess I don’t like Arundhati’s writing at all. She is a communist, feminist and a treehugging psychopath… All the three most annoying traits of a liberal revolutionary.
I recommend some horribly xenophobic, environmentally-conservative, freemarketeer like Ayn Rand or Anne Coulter (gasp!).
Let the GOST be for a while… Or you will undo everything that California has so painstakingly done.
Sherene // March 13, 2008 at 3:41 am |
Ha, I’m trudging through a slow read too – Dostoevsky’s ‘The Idiot’ – it’s tough to squeeze in any serious reading during commute to work and back.
I’ve some inexplicable aversion to Ms Roy too – she just seems so smug in that irritating leftist way…but hey, whatever works for you
Go for it!
Amrita // March 13, 2008 at 7:46 am |
@Addy: Am so glad I am not the only one who dislikes what you call ‘treehugging communist psychopaths’ (though given your choice of words, I suspect your dislike is much stronger)
@Sherene: I have a strong aversion to her non-fiction too. I don’t know why she has to make her lack of intelligence so obvious. I don’t even know if I’ll read the God of Small Things…it’s more of a superstition
./w // March 13, 2008 at 11:11 am |
Ahh, I have _so_ much to say about someone actually recommending Rand over Roy. It’s like picking someone from a pigsty and pushing them into a rooster pen. What do you find so wrong with leftism?
./w
Amrita // March 13, 2008 at 11:16 am |
@./w: I find nothing wrong with leftism per se, I have just met the wrong leftists, I guess.
I find them just as dogmatic as those they oppose. Plus, they seem to assume an oversimplified world view, and worst of all, they do all this from a moral high ground.
./w // March 13, 2008 at 11:37 am |
You are still talking about “leftists”, not leftism
What you have seen is true irrespective of political, religious, cultural or racial category. The only political manifesto that assumes an oversimplified (and frankly, impossible) model of society is libertarianism which, btw, also has rightist influence.
Does this mean you are politically disinclined or right-wing?
./w
Amrita // March 13, 2008 at 11:47 am |
Exactly. I am speaking about leftists, not leftism. And I agree that any extremist would display the same characteristics. It’s just that I have encountered many extreme proponents of leftism, which is why my opinion of them (leftists, and not really leftism) is more crystallized. Yes, yes, it’s a half-baked world-view, and I am working on it
My political and economic views are slightly right-leaning (just slightly though) My problem is that I see the wrong in every position, so it’s difficult to take a stand.
./w // March 13, 2008 at 12:20 pm |
I am politically dispassionate and consider it only a matter of debate and nothing else. However, if we were to discuss agendas, I would be happier to stay left. They consider individual liberty paramount and if everyone just sticks to that (and _just_ that), people would stop sticking their fricken dicks into oil-wells that don’t belong to them.
I can imagine why it’d be easy to lean a little to the right. It is, afterall, a left-centric state. However, it will take you only days to change your mind if you were to visit states like Ohio, Arkansas, [insert favourite bible-belt state here], and even, to some extent, Texas (Austin is very liberal but much of Texas is still right-wing).
./w
./w // March 13, 2008 at 12:21 pm |
Errata: I meant “..I can imagine why it’d be easy to lean a little to the right.. living in CA
./w
Addy // March 14, 2008 at 10:37 am |
Oh Absolutely… and I notice your dropping the ‘feminist’ in your list of disliked characteristics.
Arundhati came to my school for a ‘Book Reading’ for ‘The End of Imagination’- one of my strongest OTS moments happened when she went – “I secede… independent mobile republic… female but have nothing against eunuchs… help me design our flag”.
I gave her four interjections later! I had to be restrained by this person who felt it was getting impolite. Probably that sensitivity took him to the Rhodes Scholarship.
Amrita // March 14, 2008 at 11:45 am |
@./w: I was talking about Indian politics. In America, I am completely left wing. I don’t see myself as a pro-life gun-toting patriotic non-citizen at all.
@Addy: I am sure ‘The End of Imagination’ is one of the dumbest pieces written by an established writer. But what on earth is OTS?
987s // March 15, 2008 at 8:30 am |
@Sherene: Dostoevsky is one of my favorite authors. I found The Idiot incredibly thought provoking in a way that few authors manage. If you appreciated The Idiot, you should try The Brothers Karamazov.
Addy // March 16, 2008 at 12:22 am |
ONE TIGHT SLAP
Suchi // March 25, 2008 at 7:01 pm |
Arundhati Roy’s political essays are a bit wishy-washy. However, I take more issue with Arundhati Roy’s pretentious and heavy writing style.
I thought that first paragraph of GOST had all the hallmarks of a writer trying too hard. IMHO, an affected style like that can only work if the content matches up — for instance, Rushdie’s wordplay suits his whimsical storylines and his general irreverence. It is integrated into the novel. Roy’s on the other hand stands out like a sore thumb.
That’s one reason why her non-fiction tends to be so terrible. The utter lack of content and argument shows up the style for what it is.
//end rant!